📘 Chapter 13: Unjust Enrichment
🔹 Meaning of Unjust Enrichment
Unjust enrichment means gaining a benefit unfairly at the expense of another without any legal justification.
🧾 It is a principle based on equity and justice which ensures that no one should be allowed to profit unjustly at the expense of another.
🔹 Definition
Unjust enrichment is: “A situation where one person is enriched at the expense of another in circumstances that the law sees as unjust.”
🔹 Essential Elements of Unjust Enrichment
To claim unjust enrichment, the following three conditions must be fulfilled:
1. ✅ Enrichment of the defendant
➤ The defendant must have gained some benefit.
2. ✅ At the expense of the plaintiff
➤ The benefit must come directly or indirectly from the plaintiff.
3. ✅ Unjust to retain the benefit
➤ Keeping the benefit must be unfair or against the principles of equity.
🔹 Examples of Unjust Enrichment
📌 A receives money by mistake from B. A must return it.
📌 B constructs a house on A’s land thinking it’s his. A enjoys it knowingly. A must compensate B.
🔹 Restitution in Unjust Enrichment
Restitution means returning or compensating for the benefit received.
If someone is unjustly enriched, the court may order restitution to the aggrieved party.
🔹 Defenses to Unjust Enrichment
The defendant may avoid liability if they can prove:
1. ❌ Gift – The enrichment was voluntarily given as a gift.
2. ❌ Contractual right – The benefit was received under a valid contract.
3. ❌ Change of position – The defendant has changed their position based on the belief that the benefit was rightly theirs.
🔹 Remedies Available
🔸 Monetary Compensation – Paying back the value of the unjust enrichment.
🔸 Constructive Trust – Holding the property or asset in trust for the rightful owner.
🔸 Subrogation – Allowing one party to step into the shoes of another to recover payment.
🔹 Importance in Business Law
✔ Prevents fraud and exploitation
✔ Promotes fairness and justice
✔ Encourages ethical business conduct
🔹 Case Laws (Illustrative)
📚 Fibrosa v. Fairbairn (1943): A contract was frustrated, but the advance payment was ordered to be returned under the principle of unjust enrichment.
📚 Moses v. Macferlan (1760): First recognized unjust enrichment under common law. Lord Mansfield held that one should not retain money wrongly received.
🔚 Conclusion
Unjust enrichment ensures that legal systems support fairness and do not allow anyone to benefit wrongly at someone else’s cost. It is a moral and legal principle fundamental to business justice.
0 Comments